<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>abednarz.net &#187; os x</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abednarz.net/wp/tag/os-x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abednarz.net/wp</link>
	<description>Bed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 06:20:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Disk Fragmentation &amp; OS X: When Does it Become a Problem?</title>
		<link>http://abednarz.net/wp/2009/04/disk-fragmentation-os-x-when-does-it-become-a-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://abednarz.net/wp/2009/04/disk-fragmentation-os-x-when-does-it-become-a-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[theAppleBlog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defrag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abednarz.net/wp/?p=400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disk fragmentation is an old problem that has affected every operating system throughout history. File fragmentation occurs when a single file isn’t located in the same physical location on the disk, but is scattered around. OS X does a great job at minimizing file fragmentation by rewriting files in contiguous space when a file is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disk fragmentation is an old problem that has affected every operating system throughout history. File fragmentation occurs when a single file isn’t located in the same physical location on the disk, but is scattered around. OS X does a great job at minimizing file fragmentation by rewriting files in contiguous space when a file is opened, is under 20MB and contains more than eight fragments. This works quite well to prevent heavy file fragmentation, but what it doesn’t prevent is free space fragmentation.</p>
<p><a href="http://theappleblog.com/2009/04/14/disk-fragmentation-os-x-when-does-it-become-a-problem/">Read more at The Apple Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://abednarz.net/wp/2009/04/disk-fragmentation-os-x-when-does-it-become-a-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using Git With OS X: 6 Tools to Get You Up and Running</title>
		<link>http://abednarz.net/wp/2009/03/using-git-with-os-x-6-tools-to-get-you-up-and-running/</link>
		<comments>http://abednarz.net/wp/2009/03/using-git-with-os-x-6-tools-to-get-you-up-and-running/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[theAppleBlog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[git]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abednarz.net/wp/?p=380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want to know how to use Git under OS X? Hit up my latest article at The Apple Blog to find out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want to know how to use Git under OS X? Hit up my latest article at <a href="http://theappleblog.com/2009/03/10/using-git-with-os-x-6-tools-to-get-you-up-and-running/">The Apple Blog</a> to find out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://abednarz.net/wp/2009/03/using-git-with-os-x-6-tools-to-get-you-up-and-running/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Text navigation shortcuts in Parallels 4</title>
		<link>http://abednarz.net/wp/2009/03/text-navigation-shortcuts-in-parallels-4/</link>
		<comments>http://abednarz.net/wp/2009/03/text-navigation-shortcuts-in-parallels-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyboard shortcuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text navigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abednarz.net/wp/?p=373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most annoying thing with running windows in a Parallels virtual machine, is that the default key mappings for navigating text is different between windows and OS X: Windows: Go to end of line = End Go to start of line = Home Go to next word = control-right arrow Go to previous word = [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most annoying thing with running windows in a Parallels virtual machine, is that the default key mappings for navigating text is different between windows and OS X:</p>
<p><strong>Windows:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Go to end of line = End
<li>Go to start of line = Home
<li>Go to next word = control-right arrow
<li>Go to previous word = control-left arrow
</ul>
<p><strong>OS X:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Go to end of line = command-right arrow
<li>Go to start of line = comand-left arrow
<li>Go to next word = option(alt)-right arrow
<li>Go to previous word = option(alt)-left arrow
</ul>
<p>Parallels by default remaps the text copy, cut &#038; paste from command-c to control-c, command-v to control-v etc. Why oh Why didn&#8217;t it do this for text navigation I bemoaned over and over, frustratingly trying to remember which OS I was using and switching to the right one.</p>
<p>Then, today, I had a moment of clarity. It was so obvious. I felt stupid for not looking for it before. Behold the screen shot below and now I am calm and relaxed with a unified text navigation scheme.</p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://abednarz.net/parallels%20mapping.png" class="alignnone" width="681" height="497" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://abednarz.net/wp/2009/03/text-navigation-shortcuts-in-parallels-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

